Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO successor bestseller | Cnews.cz
Your time very successful Cooler Master Hyper 212 (Plus) had purchase counseling is always stable place. Golden age of Taiwanese producer ended up putting a competitive Gelid Tranquillo (rev. 1). Both coolers are not only longer but their successors, as well as stiff competition.
Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo: Introduction, innovation and specifications Judging by the interim results of a survey plastazote foam of interest to you coolers plastazote foam with prerequisite for high performance not as large sums of money. Therefore, we decided in the coming days to examine trio of promising aspirants looking to receive plastazote foam an "Smart Buy" for the best price-performance ratio in the category of about 750 CZK / 30 EUR. Also thanks to your votes, we chose to test Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, Arctic Freezer i30 and Gelid Tranquillo (rev. 2).
Points will flatten the already-reviewed Enermax ETS-T40-VD which version backlight Fan ("TB") and nickel-plated metal hardware buy it from 800 CZK / 32 EUR. The price for Cooler Master plastazote foam Hyper 212 Evo and Arctic Freezer i30 is around 700 CZK / 28 EUR, cheapest Gelid Tranquillo rev. 2 buy it from 600 CZK / 24 EUR.
Specifications Cooler Master plastazote foam Hyper 212 Evo supported Intel socket LGA 2011/1155/1156/1366/775, AMD FM1, AM3 +, AM3, AM2 +, AM2 overall dimensions of 120 80 159 mm Weight plastazote foam 570 g 4 heatpipes (6 mm) fan pack 120 mm PWM fan speed so 600-1600 rev. / min indicated max. 9-31 dBA noise max. 24.9-66.3 CFM airflow / 42.3-113 m / h sliding bearings price to 17.4.2012 [tiphardware] 766 / 30.65 manufacturer's web www.coolermaster.com
Continuous Direct Contact is a patented technology from Cooler Master, which means direct contact with the surface of the thermo-conductive tubes processor, but medziprestor between them has not filled aluminum (as the base only "Direct Contact") which arise in transitions and material inequalities warmer place, because which reduces the efficiency of the entire cooling radiator.
According to the manufacturer's words perfectly flat interface of all heat-conducting tubes each "continuous" touch and waste heat is discharged from the base evenly than it was with the older version "Plus". plastazote foam
Own ancestor, thus 212+. The bag is set to 600-700 rpm (a target temperature of 60 C, so that the speed does not increase), which is totally silent, cooled plastazote foam Phenom X4 955 (125W TDP) and full load (half an hour at a stretch of 100% under the load of my testing ) keeps CPU below 50 C. If this is the average power, so really do not need anything better:-) The ventilation of the cabinet to the old one 12 cm fan at the front and the other blows from the housing, also at 600 rpm. Cabinet Fractal Design R3. e: so my challenges, date of publication of the article "Thursday, 19 April 2012" somehow does not fit:-) to post comments log in or register.
It's not downright negative aspect, because it is plusmínosoch. In general, radiators plastazote foam with wider spacing between plastazote foam ribs are assumed to be quieter when Roll mode, but again may fall behind in tests aimed at high performance. CM 212 at low dBA is not among the top (I hate to even the worse) nor in its price.
Thanks for the review. It could not be added to the noise test Nanoxiou to those 1200RPM, once in the settings you measure the temperature? After all, who of people plastazote foam who will buy their aftermarket cooler operates at values such 2000RPM? :) To post comments, sign in or register.
Modify / complement it will probably not. First, it lacked the results of older chillers and also 1200 rev. / Min for stock Fans always conveniently not set, ie. probably would be stupid to create plastazote foam almost every intentionally compared to those other numbers (and measurement errors) with the same settings NANOXIA for which the reduced speed always set the same voltage. To post comments, sign in or register.
Understand. Supplementing the noise while also not completely accurate (within the limits plastazote foam of the most accurate), but setting a fixed speed NANOXIA (1200 rev. / Min) can no longer easily compare the noise with stock fans (~ 1200 rev. / Min) of a line chart. But even so it no longer has a price deal, at least 3 coolers already returned unable to test and incomplete charts plastazote foam do not want. To post comments, sign in or register.
I do not understand what you're always talking about the stock fan, me as the comparison of passive parts, because I assume that's why you're not ranked test with a single fan, or maybe not? Why we compare only relatively senseless (impractical) setting 2000RPM? Measurements of stock Fans are irrelevant in this (or. Less accurate), everyone has different properties (bearings, rotor design, etc..). To post comments, sign in or register.
Jj, despite the fact that everyone has the stock blower other features would be someone interested in comparing their results (ie. Draw indicative fan power) when the speed of comparable NANOXIA, plastazote foam but of course flatten n
Your time very successful Cooler Master Hyper 212 (Plus) had purchase counseling is always stable place. Golden age of Taiwanese producer ended up putting a competitive Gelid Tranquillo (rev. 1). Both coolers are not only longer but their successors, as well as stiff competition.
Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo: Introduction, innovation and specifications Judging by the interim results of a survey plastazote foam of interest to you coolers plastazote foam with prerequisite for high performance not as large sums of money. Therefore, we decided in the coming days to examine trio of promising aspirants looking to receive plastazote foam an "Smart Buy" for the best price-performance ratio in the category of about 750 CZK / 30 EUR. Also thanks to your votes, we chose to test Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo, Arctic Freezer i30 and Gelid Tranquillo (rev. 2).
Points will flatten the already-reviewed Enermax ETS-T40-VD which version backlight Fan ("TB") and nickel-plated metal hardware buy it from 800 CZK / 32 EUR. The price for Cooler Master plastazote foam Hyper 212 Evo and Arctic Freezer i30 is around 700 CZK / 28 EUR, cheapest Gelid Tranquillo rev. 2 buy it from 600 CZK / 24 EUR.
Specifications Cooler Master plastazote foam Hyper 212 Evo supported Intel socket LGA 2011/1155/1156/1366/775, AMD FM1, AM3 +, AM3, AM2 +, AM2 overall dimensions of 120 80 159 mm Weight plastazote foam 570 g 4 heatpipes (6 mm) fan pack 120 mm PWM fan speed so 600-1600 rev. / min indicated max. 9-31 dBA noise max. 24.9-66.3 CFM airflow / 42.3-113 m / h sliding bearings price to 17.4.2012 [tiphardware] 766 / 30.65 manufacturer's web www.coolermaster.com
Continuous Direct Contact is a patented technology from Cooler Master, which means direct contact with the surface of the thermo-conductive tubes processor, but medziprestor between them has not filled aluminum (as the base only "Direct Contact") which arise in transitions and material inequalities warmer place, because which reduces the efficiency of the entire cooling radiator.
According to the manufacturer's words perfectly flat interface of all heat-conducting tubes each "continuous" touch and waste heat is discharged from the base evenly than it was with the older version "Plus". plastazote foam
Own ancestor, thus 212+. The bag is set to 600-700 rpm (a target temperature of 60 C, so that the speed does not increase), which is totally silent, cooled plastazote foam Phenom X4 955 (125W TDP) and full load (half an hour at a stretch of 100% under the load of my testing ) keeps CPU below 50 C. If this is the average power, so really do not need anything better:-) The ventilation of the cabinet to the old one 12 cm fan at the front and the other blows from the housing, also at 600 rpm. Cabinet Fractal Design R3. e: so my challenges, date of publication of the article "Thursday, 19 April 2012" somehow does not fit:-) to post comments log in or register.
It's not downright negative aspect, because it is plusmínosoch. In general, radiators plastazote foam with wider spacing between plastazote foam ribs are assumed to be quieter when Roll mode, but again may fall behind in tests aimed at high performance. CM 212 at low dBA is not among the top (I hate to even the worse) nor in its price.
Thanks for the review. It could not be added to the noise test Nanoxiou to those 1200RPM, once in the settings you measure the temperature? After all, who of people plastazote foam who will buy their aftermarket cooler operates at values such 2000RPM? :) To post comments, sign in or register.
Modify / complement it will probably not. First, it lacked the results of older chillers and also 1200 rev. / Min for stock Fans always conveniently not set, ie. probably would be stupid to create plastazote foam almost every intentionally compared to those other numbers (and measurement errors) with the same settings NANOXIA for which the reduced speed always set the same voltage. To post comments, sign in or register.
Understand. Supplementing the noise while also not completely accurate (within the limits plastazote foam of the most accurate), but setting a fixed speed NANOXIA (1200 rev. / Min) can no longer easily compare the noise with stock fans (~ 1200 rev. / Min) of a line chart. But even so it no longer has a price deal, at least 3 coolers already returned unable to test and incomplete charts plastazote foam do not want. To post comments, sign in or register.
I do not understand what you're always talking about the stock fan, me as the comparison of passive parts, because I assume that's why you're not ranked test with a single fan, or maybe not? Why we compare only relatively senseless (impractical) setting 2000RPM? Measurements of stock Fans are irrelevant in this (or. Less accurate), everyone has different properties (bearings, rotor design, etc..). To post comments, sign in or register.
Jj, despite the fact that everyone has the stock blower other features would be someone interested in comparing their results (ie. Draw indicative fan power) when the speed of comparable NANOXIA, plastazote foam but of course flatten n
No comments:
Post a Comment